Knowledgebase

Who is most likely to be at risk from radiofrequency (RF) radiation

EMR Australia - Thursday, April 14, 2016

Young people, the aged and those with cancer are the most likely to be at risk from radiofrequency (RF) radiation, according to a recent paper in ‘Reviews on Environmental Health.’

In their review of the scientific literature, Dr Mary Redmayne and Professor Olle Johansson, found that exposure affected a number of biological processes differently according to age. These may result in different effects on health and well-being.

‘We took a new approach with this paper. We were particularly interested in comparing results of research that considered more than one age group. Because there are many natural changes over a lifetime, we reported on these first so as to put the research into life-stage context. Then we reported what the research had shown, and then on the implications for differently aged people. We followed this procedure for each topic examined, such as cognitive function,’ Dr Redmayne told EMR and Health.

The research showed that RF radiation affects brain wave patterns and the coherence of brain wave patterns in both hemispheres. The interhemispheric coherence of brain waves in young people exposed to RF was similar to that of young people with ADHD. They also observed that some brain wave patterns reported from exposure to phone radiation were similar to those in people with one kind of epilepsy.

The authors found that RF exposure increased oxidative damage—responsible for aging and disease—and reduced levels of the hormone melatonin, which plays a vital role in counteracting this damage. Redmayne and Johansson report that because foetuses, babies and the elderly have low levels of melatonin, they may be particularly at risk from exposure. In teenagers, melatonin levels may be affected, not just by RF radiation, but also by exposure to the blue light of wireless devices at night time.

RF radiation affects different types of stem cells, responsible for replacing cells in regenerating organs, the authors said. It can inhibit the repair of DNA in stem cells and damaged stem cells can contribute to cancer and malformations in the foetus. This has serious ramifications for pregnant women’s use of wireless devices.

RF radiation was shown to reduce levels of the protein CD95 which plays a role in cell death. Because malignant cells can benefit from the loss of CD95, the authors suggest that people with cancer should take steps to reduce their exposure to wireless radiation.

‘Education of those preparing for parenthood, parents, and of their children needs to be prioritized, with the minimum steps being, (a) advice to minimize exposure of the foetus and growing children of all ages to RF-EMR, and (b) how to do this,’ the authors said.

Redmayne, M and Johansson, O, ‘Radiofrequency exposure in young and old: different sensitivities in light of age-relevant natural differences’, Rev Environ Health, 2015 Dec 1;30(4):323-35


About The Author - Lyn McLean is a consumer advocate, author and educator and has been monitoring and writing on the subject of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) for over 20 years. She is the director of EMR Australia.


Follow on Feedly follow us in feedly


Trackback Link
http://www.emraustralia.com.au/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=419&PostID=620494&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Dr Dariuz Leszczynski Prof Andrew Marino Venice Resolution Dr Don Masich Dr James Oschman Dr Christine Aschermann Professor Michael Berk IAFF Dr Michael Kundi Paul Wentworth Dr Lawrence Anukam Mona Nilsson Professor Rodney Croft Dr William Rea Dr James Suckling Cindy Sage Dr Fernando Saravi Michael Dolan Dr Ronald Powell Dr Maryanne Demasi Brett Moule Dr Devra Davis Dr Asad Rahmani Dr. Neil Cherry Dr Stephanie McCarter (MD) Ohio State University Prof Olle Johansson Professor Belpomme Michael Carlberg Dr Priyanka Bandara Stewart Committee Reports Frank Drews Specific Absorption Rate (SARs) Dr, Louis, Slesin Dr Mary Redmayne WHO Dr Hugh Taylor Dr. Henry Lai Dr Stephen Solomon Catalyst John Cherry SAM Model Professor Martin Pall T Abelin Jim Phillips Salzburg Resolution Dr Arpad Szallasi (MD) Dr. Masayuki Tatemichi Dr Martin Pall Professor Hugo Lagercrantz Anne Silk Dr S Mortazavi Dr Dieudonné Dr Jean Monroe Dr David Carpenter John Patterson Dr Cyril Smith Professor Bruce Armstrong Kaspersky Lab Grant Brecht Lennart Hardell Dr Olga Naidenko Dr Larry Marshall David Suzuki Dr Dominique Belpomme Dr Magda Havas Dr Markus Kern Dr Jacquinta Lee ARPANSA RF Standard Dennis J Kucinich Essex University Study E Lopez-Martin US Senate Hearing Dr Lennart Hardell Alasdair Phillips Professor Anthony Miller Associate Professor Ray Kearney OAM Dr Siegal Sadetzki Vijayalaxmi and Maria Scarfi Dr Linda Erdreich Ken Karipidis Dr Kenneth Foster Dr De-Kun Li SCENIHR Report Dr Christopher Portier Dr Gilbert de Paula (MD) Mr Gary Melik Dr Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam A. Garcia Dr John Dockerty Dr Lisa Nagy Dr Igor Belyaev Prof Trevor Marshall Sydney Council Phone Tower Forum Dr Louis Slesin Dr Ron Overberg Frank Clegg

Archive

SuMoTuWeThFrSa
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

EMR Australia © 2017. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Sitemap | Adobe Business Catalyst Sydney