Knowledgebase

Venice resolution

EMR Australia - Thursday, September 18, 2008

International scientists endorse a precautionary approach to EMR exposure

A group of international scientists has signed a document endorsing a precautionary approach to EMR exposure. Known as the Venice Resolution, the document was initiated on 6 June by the International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety, following the 6th ICEMS Workshop, held last December.

“As stated in the Benevento Resolution of September 2001, we remain concerned about the effects of human exposure to electromagnetic fields on health. At the 6th ICEMS Workshop, entitled, “Foundations of bioelectromagnetics: towards a new rationale for risk assessment and management,” we discussed electrohypersensitivity, blood brain barrier changes, learning and behavioral effects, changes in anti-oxidant enzyme activities, DNA damage, biochemical mechanisms of interaction, biological damage and, experimental approaches to validate these effects. As an outcome, we are compelled to confirm the existence of non-thermal effects of electromagnetic fields on living matter, which seem to occur at every level of investigation from molecular to epidemiological.

“An urgent task before international researchers is to discover the detailed mechanisms of non-thermal interactions between electromagnetic fields and living matter. A collateral consequence will be the design of new general public and occupational protection standards. We, who are at the forefront of this research, encourage an ethical approach in setting of exposure standards which protect the health of all, including those who are more vulnerable. We recognize the need for research to reveal the critical exposure parameters of effect and risk from exposure to electromagnetic fields.

“The non-ionizing radiation protection standards recommended by international standards organizations, and supported by the World Health Organization, are inadequate. Existing guidelines are based on results from acute exposure studies and only thermal effects are considered. A world wide application of the Precautionary Principle is required. In addition, new standards should be developed to take various physiological conditions into consideration, eg pregnancy, newborns, children, and elderly people.

“We take exception to the claim of the wireless communication industry that there is no credible scientific evidence to conclude there is a risk. Recent epidemiological evidence is stronger than before, which is a further reason to justify precautions be taken to lower exposure standards in accordance with the Precautionary Principle.

“We recognize the growing public health problem known as electrohypersensitivity; that this adverse health condition can be quite disabling; and, that this condition requires further urgent investigation and recognition.

“We strongly advise limited use of cell phones, and other similar devices, by young children and teenagers, and we call upon governments to apply the Precautionary Principle as an interim measure while more biologically relevant standards are developed to protect against, not only the absorption of electromagnetic energy by the head, but also adverse effects of the signals on biochemistry, physiology and electrical biorhythms.”

The resolution and list of signatories to it can be found at http://www.icems.eu/docs/Venice_Resolution_0608.pdf.

from 'EMR and Health' Sept 2008, vol 4 no 3


About The Author - Lyn McLean is a consumer advocate, author and educator and has been monitoring and writing on the subject of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) for over 20 years. She is the director of EMR Australia.


Follow on Feedly follow us in feedly


Trackback Link
http://www.emraustralia.com.au/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=419&PostID=619661&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Venice Resolution ARPANSA RF Standard Dr Linda Erdreich Vijayalaxmi and Maria Scarfi Dr Stephanie McCarter (MD) Professor Belpomme Michael Dolan Dr Christine Aschermann John Cherry Dr Markus Kern Dr Hugh Taylor Ken Karipidis Associate Professor Ray Kearney OAM Dr Ron Overberg Paul Wentworth T Abelin Dr Larry Marshall Dr Devra Davis Dr S Mortazavi SCENIHR Report Dr Dieudonné Dr Cyril Smith WHO Dr. Neil Cherry Dr John Dockerty Dr Gilbert de Paula (MD) Professor Martin Pall Dr. Henry Lai Essex University Study Dr Michael Kundi Dr Ronald Powell Jim Phillips Prof Andrew Marino Brett Moule Dr Martin Pall Dr Magda Havas Dr Dominique Belpomme Dr Siegal Sadetzki Frank Clegg Specific Absorption Rate (SARs) Dr James Suckling Alasdair Phillips Dr Lawrence Anukam Dr James Oschman Prof Trevor Marshall US Senate Hearing Professor Rodney Croft Dr Maryanne Demasi Dr Dariuz Leszczynski Dr Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam Salzburg Resolution Anne Silk Dr Jean Monroe Michael Carlberg David Suzuki SAM Model Mr Gary Melik Dr Louis Slesin Prof Olle Johansson Dr Arpad Szallasi (MD) Stewart Committee Reports John Patterson Dr Kenneth Foster Dr Igor Belyaev Dr Mary Redmayne Professor Hugo Lagercrantz Dr David Carpenter Catalyst E Lopez-Martin A. Garcia Dr De-Kun Li Professor Michael Berk Kaspersky Lab Dr. Masayuki Tatemichi Dennis J Kucinich Grant Brecht Professor Bruce Armstrong Dr William Rea Dr Christopher Portier Ohio State University Professor Anthony Miller IAFF Sydney Council Phone Tower Forum Dr Jacquinta Lee Mona Nilsson Dr Olga Naidenko Dr Stephen Solomon Lennart Hardell Cindy Sage Dr Fernando Saravi Dr, Louis, Slesin Dr Priyanka Bandara Frank Drews Dr Don Masich Dr Lisa Nagy Dr Asad Rahmani Dr Lennart Hardell

Archive

SuMoTuWeThFrSa
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

EMR Australia © 2017. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Sitemap | Adobe Business Catalyst Sydney