Knowledgebase

Venice resolution

EMR Australia - Thursday, September 18, 2008

International scientists endorse a precautionary approach to EMR exposure

A group of international scientists has signed a document endorsing a precautionary approach to EMR exposure. Known as the Venice Resolution, the document was initiated on 6 June by the International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety, following the 6th ICEMS Workshop, held last December.

“As stated in the Benevento Resolution of September 2001, we remain concerned about the effects of human exposure to electromagnetic fields on health. At the 6th ICEMS Workshop, entitled, “Foundations of bioelectromagnetics: towards a new rationale for risk assessment and management,” we discussed electrohypersensitivity, blood brain barrier changes, learning and behavioral effects, changes in anti-oxidant enzyme activities, DNA damage, biochemical mechanisms of interaction, biological damage and, experimental approaches to validate these effects. As an outcome, we are compelled to confirm the existence of non-thermal effects of electromagnetic fields on living matter, which seem to occur at every level of investigation from molecular to epidemiological.

“An urgent task before international researchers is to discover the detailed mechanisms of non-thermal interactions between electromagnetic fields and living matter. A collateral consequence will be the design of new general public and occupational protection standards. We, who are at the forefront of this research, encourage an ethical approach in setting of exposure standards which protect the health of all, including those who are more vulnerable. We recognize the need for research to reveal the critical exposure parameters of effect and risk from exposure to electromagnetic fields.

“The non-ionizing radiation protection standards recommended by international standards organizations, and supported by the World Health Organization, are inadequate. Existing guidelines are based on results from acute exposure studies and only thermal effects are considered. A world wide application of the Precautionary Principle is required. In addition, new standards should be developed to take various physiological conditions into consideration, eg pregnancy, newborns, children, and elderly people.

“We take exception to the claim of the wireless communication industry that there is no credible scientific evidence to conclude there is a risk. Recent epidemiological evidence is stronger than before, which is a further reason to justify precautions be taken to lower exposure standards in accordance with the Precautionary Principle.

“We recognize the growing public health problem known as electrohypersensitivity; that this adverse health condition can be quite disabling; and, that this condition requires further urgent investigation and recognition.

“We strongly advise limited use of cell phones, and other similar devices, by young children and teenagers, and we call upon governments to apply the Precautionary Principle as an interim measure while more biologically relevant standards are developed to protect against, not only the absorption of electromagnetic energy by the head, but also adverse effects of the signals on biochemistry, physiology and electrical biorhythms.”

The resolution and list of signatories to it can be found at http://www.icems.eu/docs/Venice_Resolution_0608.pdf.

from 'EMR and Health' Sept 2008, vol 4 no 3


About The Author - Lyn McLean is a consumer advocate, author and educator and has been monitoring and writing on the subject of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) for over 20 years. She is the director of EMR Australia.


Follow on Feedly follow us in feedly


Trackback Link
http://www.emraustralia.com.au/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=419&PostID=619661&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Dr Dominique Belpomme Dr Dieudonné Dr Martin Pall Alasdair Phillips Specific Absorption Rate (SARs) Dr. Henry Lai T Abelin Dr Kenneth Foster Dr Cyril Smith Dr Jacquinta Lee Mona Nilsson Vijayalaxmi and Maria Scarfi Sydney Council Phone Tower Forum Dr Hugh Taylor IAFF Kaspersky Lab Dr Mary Redmayne Dr James Oschman Dr. Neil Cherry Dr Lennart Hardell US Senate Hearing Professor Bruce Armstrong Prof Trevor Marshall E Lopez-Martin Associate Professor Ray Kearney OAM Dr Stephanie McCarter (MD) Michael Carlberg Professor Martin Pall Michael Dolan Dr Louis Slesin Essex University Study Dr Devra Davis Dr Gilbert de Paula (MD) Dr. Masayuki Tatemichi Dr Dariuz Leszczynski Anne Silk Dr Maryanne Demasi Dr Lisa Nagy Dr Ronald Powell Dr Don Masich A. Garcia Dr, Louis, Slesin David Suzuki Dr Christopher Portier ARPANSA RF Standard SCENIHR Report SAM Model Paul Wentworth Brett Moule Dr Siegal Sadetzki John Patterson Prof Andrew Marino Dr Michael Kundi Dr Christine Aschermann Venice Resolution Dennis J Kucinich Professor Anthony Miller Dr Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam Jim Phillips Dr Stephen Solomon Ken Karipidis Dr Magda Havas Dr William Rea Mr Gary Melik Dr Asad Rahmani Lennart Hardell Dr Lawrence Anukam Prof Olle Johansson Dr Priyanka Bandara Professor Belpomme Dr Markus Kern Dr Fernando Saravi Dr S Mortazavi Professor Michael Berk Cindy Sage Dr James Suckling Dr Arpad Szallasi (MD) Dr Linda Erdreich Grant Brecht Catalyst Dr John Dockerty Dr David Carpenter John Cherry Frank Drews Dr Larry Marshall Ohio State University Dr Olga Naidenko Stewart Committee Reports Salzburg Resolution Professor Hugo Lagercrantz Dr Igor Belyaev WHO Dr Jean Monroe Frank Clegg Professor Rodney Croft Dr Ron Overberg Dr De-Kun Li

Archive

SuMoTuWeThFrSa
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

EMR Australia © 2017. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Sitemap | Adobe Business Catalyst Sydney