Hidden costs of mobile phones

EMR Australia - Thursday, August 13, 2015

It might be newer, more stylish, more popular—but would you buy it if it cost the earth?

Consumers’ desire to have the latest mobile phones on the market is good news for manufacturers but not such good news for the environment, according to a new study from the United Kingdom. In a paper published in June, Dr James Suckling and Dr Jacquinta Lee, from the University of Surrey, found that our compulsive use of mobile phones has many hidden costs.

Suckling and Lee say that the millions of discarded mobile phones lying, forgotten, in drawers and cupboards, contain millions of dollars of valuable metals including copper, silver, gold and platinum metals. The 85 million stockpiled mobile phones in the United Kingdom, for example, are estimated to contain about $170 million of gold alone. Instead of reusing these resources, we’re mining new deposits instead.

Churning out new mobile phones to replace the old ones is also contributing to global warming. ‘The averaged total GHG [Greenhouse Gas] emission of the smartphones is 47.5 kg CO2’, the authors say.

With few incentives for recycling, consumers’ mobile phones often end up in landfill where the metals and toxic substances they contain leach into the environment.

The solution, the authors say, is to encourage companies to insert a ‘take-back’ clause in their contracts so that the phones can be responsibly recycled. They also encourage the use of cloud-based storage of information to reduce the resources used in phones’ memory storage. James Suckling and Jacquetta Lee, ‘Redefining scope: the true environmental impact of smartphones?’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, DOI: 10.1007/s11367-015-0909-4, 2015.

About The Author - Lyn McLean is a consumer advocate, author and educator and has been monitoring and writing on the subject of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) for over 20 years. She is the director of EMR Australia.

Follow on Feedly follow us in feedly

Trackback Link
Post has no trackbacks.

Recent Posts



Professor Martin Pall Mr Gary Melik SCENIHR Report Prof Olle Johansson Dr De-Kun Li Dr Lawrence Anukam Michael Carlberg Dr Stephanie McCarter (MD) Dr Markus Kern Grant Brecht Dr Hugh Taylor Dr Don Masich Michael Dolan Dr Lisa Nagy Dr David Carpenter Dr. Masayuki Tatemichi E Lopez-Martin David Suzuki Dr Maryanne Demasi Jim Phillips Dr Christine Aschermann Professor Rodney Croft Dr Linda Erdreich Paul Wentworth Dr Louis Slesin Dr Olga Naidenko Dr Dariuz Leszczynski Dr Cyril Smith Dr S Mortazavi Dr Dieudonné Dr Magda Havas SAM Model Dr, Louis, Slesin Frank Drews Brett Moule A. Garcia Alasdair Phillips Stewart Committee Reports Lennart Hardell Dr Priyanka Bandara Vijayalaxmi and Maria Scarfi Dr Lennart Hardell US Senate Hearing Venice Resolution Professor Anthony Miller Dr William Rea Dr. Neil Cherry Dr Stephen Solomon Dr Mary Redmayne Anne Silk Dr Jean Monroe IAFF Dr James Suckling Mona Nilsson Dr James Oschman Catalyst Dr Asad Rahmani Dr Martin Pall Cindy Sage Dr Kenneth Foster Dr Dominique Belpomme Dr Ronald Powell John Patterson Ken Karipidis Professor Hugo Lagercrantz ARPANSA RF Standard Prof Trevor Marshall Dr Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam Dr Arpad Szallasi (MD) Dr Larry Marshall Dr Fernando Saravi Dr Michael Kundi Dr Devra Davis Sydney Council Phone Tower Forum Ohio State University Dr Ron Overberg Dr Igor Belyaev Dr John Dockerty Essex University Study Prof Andrew Marino Dr Siegal Sadetzki Dr Jacquinta Lee Kaspersky Lab Professor Michael Berk Frank Clegg T Abelin Professor Bruce Armstrong Specific Absorption Rate (SARs) Salzburg Resolution Dr. Henry Lai John Cherry WHO Dr Gilbert de Paula (MD) Dr Christopher Portier Dennis J Kucinich Associate Professor Ray Kearney OAM Professor Belpomme



EMR Australia © 2017. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Sitemap | Adobe Business Catalyst Sydney