Hidden costs of mobile phones

EMR Australia - Thursday, August 13, 2015

It might be newer, more stylish, more popular—but would you buy it if it cost the earth?

Consumers’ desire to have the latest mobile phones on the market is good news for manufacturers but not such good news for the environment, according to a new study from the United Kingdom. In a paper published in June, Dr James Suckling and Dr Jacquinta Lee, from the University of Surrey, found that our compulsive use of mobile phones has many hidden costs.

Suckling and Lee say that the millions of discarded mobile phones lying, forgotten, in drawers and cupboards, contain millions of dollars of valuable metals including copper, silver, gold and platinum metals. The 85 million stockpiled mobile phones in the United Kingdom, for example, are estimated to contain about $170 million of gold alone. Instead of reusing these resources, we’re mining new deposits instead.

Churning out new mobile phones to replace the old ones is also contributing to global warming. ‘The averaged total GHG [Greenhouse Gas] emission of the smartphones is 47.5 kg CO2’, the authors say.

With few incentives for recycling, consumers’ mobile phones often end up in landfill where the metals and toxic substances they contain leach into the environment.

The solution, the authors say, is to encourage companies to insert a ‘take-back’ clause in their contracts so that the phones can be responsibly recycled. They also encourage the use of cloud-based storage of information to reduce the resources used in phones’ memory storage. James Suckling and Jacquetta Lee, ‘Redefining scope: the true environmental impact of smartphones?’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, DOI: 10.1007/s11367-015-0909-4, 2015.

About The Author - Lyn McLean is a consumer advocate, author and educator and has been monitoring and writing on the subject of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) for over 20 years. She is the director of EMR Australia.

Follow on Feedly follow us in feedly

Trackback Link
Post has no trackbacks.

Recent Posts



E Lopez-Martin Dr Ron Overberg Dr Siegal Sadetzki Michael Carlberg Dr Lisa Nagy Dr Priyanka Bandara ARPANSA RF Standard Dr James Oschman Professor Bruce Armstrong Venice Resolution Ohio State University Dr Louis Slesin Frank Clegg Vijayalaxmi and Maria Scarfi Professor Rodney Croft Dr Maryanne Demasi US Senate Hearing Dr, Louis, Slesin Dr Devra Davis Dr Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam Dr Don Masich Lennart Hardell Dr Christopher Portier Cindy Sage Dr Larry Marshall Dr Dariuz Leszczynski Dr. Masayuki Tatemichi Michael Dolan Dr Arpad Szallasi (MD) Dr Fernando Saravi IAFF Dr Jacquinta Lee Professor Hugo Lagercrantz Dr Asad Rahmani Frank Drews Specific Absorption Rate (SARs) Dr De-Kun Li Dr David Carpenter Kaspersky Lab Essex University Study Dr William Rea Anne Silk Professor Martin Pall Stewart Committee Reports Dr S Mortazavi Professor Belpomme Dr Igor Belyaev Dr Mary Redmayne Brett Moule Dr Olga Naidenko Associate Professor Ray Kearney OAM Dr Cyril Smith Paul Wentworth Dr Lawrence Anukam John Patterson Mr Gary Melik Grant Brecht Dr Dominique Belpomme Mona Nilsson Prof Andrew Marino Dr. Henry Lai Dr Magda Havas Catalyst Dr Michael Kundi Dr. Neil Cherry Dennis J Kucinich SCENIHR Report Dr Hugh Taylor Dr Kenneth Foster Dr Jean Monroe Prof Trevor Marshall Jim Phillips Dr Ronald Powell David Suzuki Dr Christine Aschermann Dr Markus Kern Dr Martin Pall Dr Dieudonné John Cherry Dr John Dockerty Salzburg Resolution Dr James Suckling Professor Anthony Miller SAM Model A. Garcia Dr Linda Erdreich Dr Lennart Hardell T Abelin Sydney Council Phone Tower Forum Dr Gilbert de Paula (MD) Professor Michael Berk Dr Stephen Solomon Alasdair Phillips Ken Karipidis Dr Stephanie McCarter (MD) Prof Olle Johansson WHO



EMR Australia © 2017. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Sitemap | Adobe Business Catalyst Sydney