Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is real

EMR Australia - Friday, September 11, 2015

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) is real, can be demonstrated to be real and must be recognised by international authorities.

These are some of the conclusions of the 5th Paris Appeal Congress, held on 18 May in Brussels. The Congress brought together some of the big names in Bioelectromagnetics research and looked at the latest research on the condition.

‘Electromagnetic hypersensitivity exists and has to be recognised, treated and prevented,’ said Dr Michael Kundi, the head of the Institute of Environmental Health at the Medical University of Vienna.

Dr Dominique Belpomme, a professor of cancer oncology and President of the Association for Research and Treatments Against Cancer (ARTAC), said that there are objective biomarkers for diagnosing EHS. He described his study of 1216 patients referred to him with the condition. When tested, he found that 90 of these patients were genuinely electrohypersensitive. His testing showed that exposures caused observable physiological changes, such as increased levels of histamine, which is triggered by exposure and can cause breaching of the blood-brain-barrier. EHS and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) might actually be part of the same condition, involving the thalamus or limbic system, he suggested. There are a number of scientific arguments ‘strongly suggesting that self-reported EHS and/or MCS are causally-related to EMF and/or chemical exposure,’ he said.

There was general consensus that children are vulnerable and must be protected from wireless exposure urgently. Dr David Carpenter said that wireless routers and wireless devices in classrooms create an ‘enormous’ level of radiofrequency radiation. ‘Not only are children more vulnerable to environmental exposures, but if we allow our children in schools, where they’re supposed to be learning, to be exposed to an agent that reduces their ability to pay attention and learn and promotes illness, this is a tragedy, it’s foolish and we should act to reduce exposure.’

Professor Lennart Hardell said that it is necessary, ‘to abandon the wireless communication in schools. I see this as the rising big problem for human health.’ He referred to the IARC’s decision to classify radiofrequency radiation as a Class 2B (‘possible’) human carcinogen and said that the evidence of carcinogenicity has increased since then. ‘If there’s something that is at least a possible human carcinogen, why are we exposing our children to that when we don’t know the long-term effects?’

“We need biologically based public health standards and we need them now.”

A number of speakers criticised the thermally-based international standards of the World Health Organisation. Dr Michael Kundi said that there is a growing community of scientists who oppose the thermal basis of current standards. Cindy Sage, co-editor of the BioInitiative Reports of 2007 and 2012, referred to the plethora of scientific research showing evidence that everyday levels of exposure that comply with international standards cause harm. ‘We need biologically based public health standards and we need them now,’ she said.

Dr Carpenter pointed out that standards are generally set by engineers and physicists rather than the biologists and health experts who are better equipped to consider health effects of exposure.

Dr William Rea, from the Environmental Health Centre in Dallas, said that chemical sensitivity has been recognised since the time of Hippocrates and perhaps even earlier. He described the setup at his Dallas clinic, discussed different methods of testing for the condition and some of the methods he uses to treated it. People with MCS have abnormal brain scans and 80 percent of people with EHS have chemical sensitivity, Rea said.

Dr Igor Belyaev, from the Russian Academy of Science, discussed studies showing that fields from both electrical and wireless sources produce clear biological effects. These effects, he said, have been shown to depend on metals, Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and antioxidants in the exposed subjects. ‘These studies provide a mechanistic background for the treatment of electromagnetic hypersensitivity based on chelating divalent metals, reducing ROS and balancing vitamins.’

Dr S Mortazavi from Iran spoke about the risks of mercury in amalgam fillings and proposed the hypothesis that foetal exposure to mercury could contribute to autism spectrum disorders.

Ms Sage said that the next step was to lobby the World Health Organisation to recognise EHS and MCS as real diseases. The presentations of the 5th Paris Appeal Congress can be found at:


About The Author - Lyn McLean is a consumer advocate, author and educator and has been monitoring and writing on the subject of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) for over 20 years. She is the director of EMR Australia.

Follow on Feedly follow us in feedly

Trackback Link
Post has no trackbacks.

Recent Posts



Professor Rodney Croft T Abelin ARPANSA RF Standard Professor Belpomme Dr Stephanie McCarter (MD) Sydney Council Phone Tower Forum Dr Lennart Hardell Alasdair Phillips Dr Jean Monroe Vijayalaxmi and Maria Scarfi US Senate Hearing Associate Professor Ray Kearney OAM Stewart Committee Reports Salzburg Resolution Dr Maryanne Demasi Mr Gary Melik Dr De-Kun Li Dr Fernando Saravi Dr S Mortazavi Dr Devra Davis Dr Christopher Portier Dr Cyril Smith A. Garcia Dr James Oschman Anne Silk Dr Asad Rahmani Michael Carlberg Essex University Study Dr Stephen Solomon Dr Siegal Sadetzki Dr Louis Slesin Dr Linda Erdreich Dennis J Kucinich Professor Bruce Armstrong Dr. Masayuki Tatemichi Dr Dieudonné Dr. Neil Cherry Dr. Henry Lai Cindy Sage Jim Phillips Dr James Suckling Dr Mary Redmayne Dr Dominique Belpomme Dr Olga Naidenko Dr Gilbert de Paula (MD) David Suzuki Dr Markus Kern Dr, Louis, Slesin Dr Arpad Szallasi (MD) Dr Kenneth Foster Dr Dariuz Leszczynski Lennart Hardell Professor Hugo Lagercrantz Dr Lisa Nagy Ohio State University Dr Igor Belyaev Kaspersky Lab Dr William Rea Dr John Dockerty Professor Martin Pall Dr Magda Havas Dr David Carpenter Specific Absorption Rate (SARs) Dr Hugh Taylor Prof Olle Johansson Dr Martin Pall Mona Nilsson Ken Karipidis Frank Drews Brett Moule Dr Lawrence Anukam Prof Trevor Marshall Dr Ron Overberg SCENIHR Report Venice Resolution WHO Frank Clegg Grant Brecht Dr Jacquinta Lee IAFF E Lopez-Martin SAM Model Michael Dolan Paul Wentworth Dr Christine Aschermann Dr Priyanka Bandara Prof Andrew Marino Professor Anthony Miller John Cherry John Patterson Catalyst Dr Michael Kundi Dr Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam Dr Don Masich Professor Michael Berk Dr Larry Marshall Dr Ronald Powell



EMR Australia © 2017. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Sitemap | Adobe Business Catalyst Sydney