Does wireless radiation affect people’s health—and is it safe to even ask the question?

EMR Australia - Tuesday, February 23, 2016

On 16 February, ABC TV’s ‘Catalyst’ aired a program on wireless radiation called ’Wi- Fried?’ that sparked a media backlash of the ugliest kind.

The theme of the program, presented by award-winning journalist, Dr Maryanne Demasi, was ‘Could WiFi-enabled devices be harmful to our health?’—a question of importance to every single Australian.

Demasi revealed that people may be using wireless devices in ways that expose them to more radiation than allowed by the Australian standard. She reported that the International Agency for Research on Cancer had concluded that mobile phone radiation may possibly cause cancer. She showed that studies found that mobile phone radiation damaged sperm and was linked to increased brain tumour rates in heavy and long-term users. She said that Lloyds of London does not provide insurance cover for injuries caused by electromagnetic radiation; that children’s brains absorb more radiation than those of adults and that some countries have stricter radiation standards than Australia.(1)

These are indisputable facts—and Dr Demasi provided documentary evidence on the Catalyst website to support her claims.

Nevertheless, within 24 hours, the program, Demasi and Professor Devra Davis, who appeared on the program, were all under fire.

‘I was particularly disappointed to see “Wi-Fried” air yesterday in the guise of science journalism, and felt it important to reassure other viewers that the fringe position provided by Dr Davis and associates is merely that, a fringe position that is not supported by science,’ said Dr Rodney Croft, head of the Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research. (2)

The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency accused the program of ‘raising concerns’ about the health effects of wireless radiation. (3) ‘Media Watch’ criticised Demasi for previous, unrelated programs and accused her report of being ’shockingly one-sided’, (4) supporting its claims with views that that were, well, shockingly one-sided.

Two other vociferous critics of the program were Drs Bernard Stewart and Simon Chapman. Professor Stewart was quoted as saying the program was “scientifically bankrupt” and “without scientific merit” (5) while Dr Chapman was quoted as saying, ‘That is just complete rubbish. It is just crap.’(6 )

Yet, according to Catalyst, Drs Stewart and Chapman were both invited to appear on the program but declined to accept. ‘Had they agreed to be interviewed, their views would have been included as well,’ Catalyst said.

Unfortunately, none of the negative responses to the program addressed the aforementioned issues raised by Demasi or the scientific evidence she presented. Rather, the attacks concentrated on the program in general and the presenter herself.

This is not a scientific debate. It’s an unscientific assault that stoops to the lowest level of personal degradation and threatens investigative journalism itself.


Perhaps the answer lies in the words of Plato, quoted by one respondent to the program: ‘They deem him their worst enemy who tells them the truth.’

But don’t believe us. If you’re unsure whether Demasi’s claims have merit, why not read the references she provided (1) and make up your own mind?




3. news1_160217.cfm

4. s4411611.htm

5. catalyst-wifi-wrong/

6. catalyst-criticised-for-linking-wifi-with-brain-tumours- 20160216-gmw45o.html


About The Author - Lyn McLean is a consumer advocate, author and educator and has been monitoring and writing on the subject of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) for over 20 years. She is the director of EMR Australia.

Follow on Feedly follow us in feedly

Trackback Link
Post has no trackbacks.

Recent Posts



Kaspersky Lab Dr Stephanie McCarter (MD) Dr Gilbert de Paula (MD) Dr David Carpenter Vijayalaxmi and Maria Scarfi Dr Devra Davis Dr Dominique Belpomme A. Garcia Specific Absorption Rate (SARs) Dr Michael Kundi Dr Olga Naidenko Dr Jean Monroe Essex University Study Dr James Suckling US Senate Hearing Dr, Louis, Slesin Dr Christopher Portier Professor Belpomme Dr Cyril Smith Dr Martin Pall Dr S Mortazavi Grant Brecht Brett Moule Dr. Masayuki Tatemichi David Suzuki Dr. Neil Cherry IAFF WHO Michael Dolan Anne Silk Professor Rodney Croft T Abelin Stewart Committee Reports Dr Asad Rahmani Dr Lawrence Anukam Dr Markus Kern SCENIHR Report Dr Mary Redmayne Prof Trevor Marshall Dr Hugh Taylor Dr De-Kun Li Associate Professor Ray Kearney OAM Professor Anthony Miller Frank Clegg Dr Ronald Powell Ken Karipidis Dr Lisa Nagy Alasdair Phillips ARPANSA RF Standard Dr Kenneth Foster Ohio State University Dr Stephen Solomon Dr Priyanka Bandara Professor Hugo Lagercrantz SAM Model Cindy Sage Dr Magda Havas Dr Linda Erdreich Dr Dieudonné Salzburg Resolution Dr Arpad Szallasi (MD) Dr John Dockerty Dr Ron Overberg Dr Don Masich Sydney Council Phone Tower Forum Dennis J Kucinich Lennart Hardell Professor Martin Pall Dr William Rea Dr. Henry Lai Dr Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam Dr James Oschman Dr Jacquinta Lee Paul Wentworth Dr Dariuz Leszczynski Professor Bruce Armstrong Michael Carlberg Mr Gary Melik Dr Fernando Saravi Prof Andrew Marino Professor Michael Berk Dr Siegal Sadetzki Dr Christine Aschermann Dr Maryanne Demasi John Patterson Dr Igor Belyaev E Lopez-Martin Dr Larry Marshall Dr Lennart Hardell Dr Louis Slesin Frank Drews Prof Olle Johansson Jim Phillips Venice Resolution Catalyst Mona Nilsson John Cherry



EMR Australia © 2017. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Sitemap | Adobe Business Catalyst Sydney